this patch was made for singleplayers who don't know micro of a pro from that of a noob, and that counts both for battle and campaign (trust me, no legendary campaign is ever the same as vs a human). Never mind those of us who greifed the patch 15 patch, never mind those of us who can see that shogun is a superior game, never mind that the menu doesn't even at 1 point mention 'multiplayer' but that it is sub-menus and classified under terms as 'quickbattle' and 'battle list' hell i wouldn't be suprised if 70% dont even know the game has multiplayer, where in shogun it was obvius from the get go, it only had 2 main menus 'single player' and 'multiplayer'. I just dont understand the drama, Im sure CA has plenty of interest in MP or they wouldnt be working on MP arena.īTW, how is it blatantly obvious? What exactly has not improved in MP from it's release? What was better about MP at release?

The worst complaints now other than the increased time are chariots and we've been down that road before. No more 'overly rehearsed 4 minute rush ****' the battles now are 10 -15 minutes, it's awesome. Hell I think that alone is its greatest improvement. I think jonas is still upset by the increased time it takes to have a battle. If CA cared less about MP, what explains this? It looks like many more folks like this patch, and they're proving it by playing it more often. All other patches have had a temporary spike in #s then tremendous drop off of participation. When I get online I see more people playing R2 weeks after patch 15.

It is blatantly obvious that CA do not care about MP from the way they barely devoted any attention to it. 2K A Total War Saga: Thrones of Britannia.847 A Total War Saga: Fall of the Samurai.

Multiplayer games pc and mac